Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
 
"Celebrity is a mask that eats into the face. As soon as one is aware of being 'somebody', to be watched and listened to with extra interest, input ceases, and the performer goes blind and deaf in his over-animation. One can either see or be seen." ~John Updike

Conjoined Twin Engaged

January 14th 2009 03:10


It was announced on XM Radio that conjoined twin Brittany Hensel is engaged. The connected twins were born in Minnesota and sky-rocketed to fame the moment they were born. To heighten peoples’ curiosity, Brittany and Abby filmed a popular documentary for the TLC channel and have been seen in various esteemed magazines.


Though Brittany is engaged, Abby (her other half) is not engaged. They also have separate driver’s licenses, favorite foods, distinct personalities and so forth. So why is it so shocking to know one is engaged? What about sex? Let’s face it. Sex is the question on everyone’s mind. It’s not like one can leave while the other is having sex. Will both enjoy the sex together? If they have children whose child will it be? I suppose what is awkward to us is normal to them. Best of luck Brittany, and congratulations on your engagement.

The Anatomy of the twins from Wikipedia:

Most of Abigail's and Brittany's shared organs are located at or below the level of the navel and their merging coccyx.



•2 heads
•2 completely separate spinal cords
•2 spines with ribs bridging the two columns

•2 arms (originally 3, but rudimentary central arm was surgically removed, leaving central shoulder blade in place)
•1 broad ribcage, with surgery to correct scoliosis and expand the pleural cavities
•2 breasts
•2 highly fused sternums, traces of bridging ribs
•4 lungs (medial lungs moderately fused, not involving Brittany's upper right lobe); three pleural cavities
•1 diaphragm with well-coordinated involuntary breathing, slight central defect
•2 hearts in a shared circulatory system (nutrition, respiration, medicine taken by either affects both)
•2 stomachs
•2 gallbladders
•1 liver, enlarged and elongated right lobe
•Y-shaped small intestine which experiences a slightly spastic double peristalsis at the juncture
•1 large intestine with one colon
•2 left kidneys, 1 right kidney
•1 bladder
•1 set of reproductive organs
•2 separate half-sacrums, which converge distally
•1 slightly broad pelvis
•2 legs
298
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Recent Posts:
      BRB 
      Kardashian Sprays Windex on Food to Stay Fit 
      Nicolas Cage's Pyramid 
      Donald Trump's Hair 
      Gavin Rossdale Cheated with Courtney Love 
Comments
194 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Damo

January 14th 2009 06:18
Intense

Comment by Teresa Ralton

January 14th 2009 06:52
Yes, wouldn't we all like to know how they have sex! I mean, this is really a 2 headed person, isn't it? Would the fiancee kiss 2 of them? I'm sure they are (she is?) lovely, but I can't help but think the fiancee must be some sort of sexual weirdo rather than a one in a million loving and accepting man. Am I too cynical?

Comment by Cheryl J

January 14th 2009 08:27
I'm with Teresa on this. As much as I would like to think the guy ell in love with the inner person, I have to say the cynic in me thinks he is probably a fetishist or something.

I do wish them all the best though and hope the girls can find happiness, I'm sure their lives must be a nightmare.

Comment by alt_ed

January 14th 2009 11:03
Meh- really, who cares how they have sex... are we ment to ponder the sexual appetites of every living person on the planet? FUCK! That doesn't leave one with much time for anything else--- Imagine that, having to devote a ponderous moment to each and every person on the plant (like over SIX-BILLION!!!!).

These girls really are two separate people- two minds, to hearts... sure, they share the reproductive organs, but all that really means is if one was to fall pregnant the other is like a semi-surrogate mother I guess.

Why does Brittney's fiancé have to be a sick weirdo? Don't we all like to spout shit about how it's whats on the inside that counts?? Well, these twins merely share some transport- but as far as the minds are concerned they are as unique as any of us!!

Comment by Teresa Ralton

January 14th 2009 11:52
But one of them can't fall pregnant. It must be both because they share reproductive organs.
I rarely think of other people having sex, I'm really not interested; but with something so very unusual ... my mind goes into overdrive. That's pretty normal, I'd say. There was a pair of Siamese twins, I think it was the originals, who had a falling out and didn't speak for about 10 years. That's weird too.

Comment by moonglow

January 14th 2009 15:50
I think it's great! They are human beings just like us- and worthy of love.

Comment by Anonymous

January 14th 2009 17:17
Anyone who throws a shadow over these two girls, young women is not just a cynic but a butt-head! plain and simple. People, get your head out of the gutter about this. I am certain this is something three of them have discussed. They are adults here you know. I am certain these girls have had a handson approach with thier doctor and have been schooled in things we as normal (whatever that maybe) people couldn't imagine.

Give this guy a break for Christ sakes. There are a few of us guys who do look for that inner beauty, the soul of that person. Big hooters, juicy buttocks, take them all. Give me someone who is comfortable in her own body, isn't selfish and egotisic and has some smarts about her. Besids gravity is gonna take over in the long run but that inner beauty never fades unless it is ignored.

So to the twins, you go. I wish you all the happiness and love you can handle!

Comment by Teresa Ralton

January 14th 2009 22:02
Get off your high horse, lady!

Comment by Anonymous

January 15th 2009 00:44
I bet if it weren't for the Religous Reich both of them could marry him.

Comment by Sara Dobson

January 15th 2009 05:46
I tend to go along with teresa and Cheryl on this one. They may have two seperate brains but they only one lot of reproductive organs and one st of arms to put around the guy. And how do you have sex when your sister is watching?

He is marrying both of them if the other got married as well then both men would be sharing the same arms when cuddling and the same sex organs.,

Comment by alt_ed

January 15th 2009 07:51
well, to be fair the girls did have three arms originally, and actually still have three shoulder blades.

So I guess what you're all trying to say is that women without reproductive organs aren't really women at all?? Fuck- there's a lot of nill-gendered people out there, isn't there--- what should we name these mystical creatures with breasts and no ovaries of their own?? hmmm, Men? Nope, shit, they don't have dicks either-- Oh well, lets just call them freaks and write nasty little comments about how kinky their sex lives must be!

Comment by Teresa Ralton

January 15th 2009 10:35
calm down Alt-ed. No-one is saying anything nasty about them. It's just that the whole concept is so mind-boggling. I applaud the parents for having the courage to allow them to live. Not many people would do that. I've seen siamese twins before but never with such a closely shared body. Being curious is human. And they do look like a mythical creature.

Comment by alt_ed

January 15th 2009 11:06
Well, thank god you accept them Teresa!

Comment by Cheryl J

January 15th 2009 12:08
Gees Alt-ed, hostile much? Nobody is wishing them ill, we are all just finding it hard to wrap our heads around. All of us want to believe that people will love someone for pure reasons but in this case the guy truly is marrying two women. What on earth will happen if he and the other twin have a falling out? It's just something that is natural human curiosity to wonder about. I think everybody actually hopes they'll all find real happiness but because it's so far out of the spectrum of what any of us would normally face we are curious about it all.

Comment by RubySoho

January 15th 2009 12:30
What would be really interesting is if the other twin also got hitched. Do you reckon the hubbies would be jealous of each other? it's like when you have sex with one, you have sex with the other whether intentional or not. Wait a minute, I hope these girls aren't religious, surely that's fornication or adultery right?

Hmmm. Good on 'em though. It's hard enough for a single-headed girl to find a decent bloke these days. I'm well impressed.

Comment by Tracy

January 15th 2009 21:14
It is quite extraordinary, but then life often is.

Comment by Bryn

January 16th 2009 01:35
I feel ill.

Comment by postmoderncritic

January 16th 2009 02:25
I'm with Alt_ed, Ruby and Tracy on this one (and thank you, Alt_ed and Ruby, for making me laugh!)... life is difficult, but you find a way to make it work - at least, that's what I think right now.

I'm sure all three people are as happy as they can be, and I'm shocked at Teresa's implication that the twins parents might not have let them live. Nowhere in this post was there even a hint of such murderous intent from anyone.

Oh, and imagine if they read this? How do you think they would feel? It's also never nice to assume things about people you've never met, like the kind of people they attract. Why do we have to jump to conclusions?

Comment by sydneybelinda

January 16th 2009 04:33
Brittany did you fart? No it was Abby
hehehe

Comment by Teresa Ralton

January 16th 2009 16:58
Why do people have to get so worked up about off-hand comments?
No-one was making assumptions, PMC, simply throwing a few thoughts into the air, as people do.
As for the implication that the twins parents might not let them live: I was told years ago by nurses that when babies are born with deformities such as this it is left up to the parents to decide if they are to live. I just assumed everyone knew this. If more people looked beyond 'normal' then we would have many more strange looking people. Have you ever seen the 1932 film 'Freaks'?
I'm sure these girls have plenty of more important things to deal with in their lives than to worry about a few people discussing how they would have sex.

Comment by alt_ed

January 18th 2009 01:35
If more people looked beyond 'normal' then we would have many more strange looking people.

Well thank god Teresa, in Australia we've a multitude of specialist facilities (institutions) where these "strange" people are locked up and kept away from us "normal" people.

Why do people have to get so worked up about off-hand comments?


I don't know Teresa, why do people get so worked about about off-hand comments on blog sites? You seem to be a prime example--- and if you have an issue with any of my, OFF-HAND comments, perhaps the best person to address these with is me, not just random bloggers whom have no control over me as the individual entity that I am (just a thought!).

Comment by a mother of conjoined twins

January 19th 2009 15:34
Each of you with negative comments should look closely in the mirror at yourselves...then, you should read your comments out loud so you can hear what your saying...I am
sorry your thoughts and feelings are what they are...your comments effect more than the girls themselves, but all the people who know them and other families and friends of conjoined twins like ourselves. Each of us are a miracles, and I feel blessed God chose me to be the mother of my two beautiful daughters. My advice to those of you with your curious minds...channel your energy to volunteering somewhere to be helpful rather than wondering how God has already decided for us how our lives will go...

Comment by Anonymous

January 21st 2009 13:17
This is not normal, they are monsters really...There is no god wake up!! SOmeone has to say the truth...

Comment by Teresa Ralton

January 21st 2009 13:55
Mother of conjoined twins? Yeah, right. I think you 're the same anonymous who pretended to be a guy ... but you overdid the dismissal of physical beauty. Maybe you are also that last anonymous, trying to confuse us.

Comment by Anonymous

January 26th 2009 03:37
cant they used the telepods to find a cure...???...

Comment by Anonymous

January 26th 2009 03:37
cant they used the telepods to find a cure...???...

Comment by CM Skittle

January 26th 2009 16:56
ewwww, these people are so gross!! it's like okay it's too bad you have two heads and all but you should NOT be having sex with people with your sister watching cause that's just gross

Comment by Onkodjinn

March 6th 2009 11:30
if you are a conjoined twin, youve been at every intimate moment that the other has had SINCE BIRTH. since this is true, they most likely think of themselves as ONE. they might have 2 personalities, but something tells me they are stupid enough to think they should actually "leave while the other has sex". jesus.

leave teresa alone, shes got a much better point than any of you realize. most parents would have risked an almost certainly fatal surgery (which im sure you'll argue with).

and now that ive put my normal two cents in, now im going for the horrible two cents.

double head, that would be freakin' sweet. thats right, i went there.

So if god created them, what the fuck was his plan?

Comment by Onkodjinn

March 6th 2009 11:32
aren't stupid enough*. like i was saying, they probably dont see themselves as separate, and id bet dollars against cents that they dont think its weird at all.

Comment by Mathew

March 11th 2009 04:37
From a legal perspective they are two people.
So it was important to make that distinction for the purpose of marriage.
In reality its a two for one deal for the husband.
My advice is not to rush into marriage but live with them and see how things go.
The kinky thrills might wane pretty quickly.
Also remember sex isnt only involving the genitals.
I hope that they can take turns at blow jobs.
He should be able to count on double the bj action.
In a way thats a fair compensation for twice the nagging he will need to put up with.

Comment by Anonymous

March 18th 2009 22:35
I'd put all four of my dicks in them.
...think about it.

Comment by Anonymous

March 18th 2009 23:03
KILL THE BEAS!!!!!
KILL IT!!!!

Comment by Anonymous

March 18th 2009 23:04
somebody put a bullet in that horrible thing

Comment by Anonymous

March 18th 2009 23:06
KILL IT! KILL IT!!!!!

Comment by Anonymous

March 18th 2009 23:07
MONSTER!

Comment by Concerned Parent

March 18th 2009 23:09
Since they share their doodads and hoosits "down there", couldn't the husband be charged with rape if both heads don't agree to his amorous affections?

Also, if it becomes pregnant, who knows whose egg it will be?

Comment by Anonymous

March 18th 2009 23:13
why havent it killed itself yet?

Comment by Anonymous

April 13th 2009 22:27
I admit I was stunned when I first saw these two girls in a documentary, and who wouldn't be? But it took just 5 minutes to adjust and get used to the idea. I'm sick of hearing people scream "Monster!" (as has been repeatedly shouted by some intolerant dipshit on this thread)They are two lovely girls who are stuck together by a known in-utero condition. With regards to relationships: they also share the same sensations from the navel downwards, so I would think that any sexual activity would clearly be an issue for them both. So one twin is serious with a guy - the other twin would surely have to be consenting, else she would be engaging in activity with a man she didn't want near her! It's a hell of a conundrum, but it's just one of many hurdles that these two girls have had to overcome, hurdles that most of us never have to deal with. This makes them all the stronger for it. Best of luck to both of them, and I hope they lead a long and happy life!

Comment by Nape

May 4th 2009 21:59
I am starting to think that Teresa are Britney and Abby. Or a very close God hating friend of theirs.

Comment by Nape

May 4th 2009 22:03
OOPS not Teresa HAHAHAHAH OMG I meant Alt-Ed .... hehehe

Comment by Nape

May 4th 2009 22:08
Now then. It would be interesting to be the guy who is marrying the one. So how does that make Abby feel? What if she wants to get married? If that were to happen when it comes to sex as everyone is to curious about then the second guy would have to be that fetish wierdo.. cause the two guys would have to share! That is jsut wrong! That is like having a 4 way and even still, as it is now it would be a 3 way wich is still wrong! How many couples out there do you see having 3 ways? When they are married. Hell I would not want some guy having sex with my wife! that is for SURE!

Comment by lifestudent

May 12th 2009 07:34
I (and the people around me) have been constantly re-working my understanding of the human mind. This involves what happens during sex.

As each partner (or single, if masturbating) approaches orgasm, their bodies put hormones into their blood stream. When these super-concentrated hormones reach the brain, they burn-in whatever image, feeling, sensation, or any other input the person is receiving. This burned-in sensation is now a turn-on.

As my own curiosity permited, I masturbated to the idea of my girlfriend and I hugging and the lighthearted feeling she created. As a result, when we hugged and/or kissed, I got aroused. (for those curious, this was when I was in Highschool and still learing more rapidly than I could keep track of.)

All this to say that when/if Brittany has sex with her hubby, Abby will become attached to him emotionally as well. If she has a strong, stubborn mind, and is extremely disinterested in every way, she will probably fight it off pretty well, but these hormones are powerfull. If she doesn't have a strong mind (like 99% of humanity, including me) she won't stand up long at all and will probably end up wishing within the year that He was her husband too.

To help show how powerfull these hormones are, I will share that I am one of those few guys out there who love a woman for her soul, not her chest or bjs or whatever your thing is. Being the loving man I am, I don't want to lust after my girlfriend's body, therefore I am currently single until I get my hormones straight (14 months so far, and still no idea of when I can permit myself to love another) of course, concerning mattes of love, my mind is weak. concerning most other matters, I am very loud and stubborn, a very testing predicament I have been battling since I started puberty and have yet to solve.

If you wish to ask me questions or discuss something, feel free to email me at lifestudent101@gmail.com because I more than likely will not visit this page again.

Comment by lifestudent

May 12th 2009 07:34
I (and the people around me) have been constantly re-working my understanding of the human mind. This involves what happens during sex.

As each partner (or single, if masturbating) approaches orgasm, their bodies put hormones into their blood stream. When these super-concentrated hormones reach the brain, they burn-in whatever image, feeling, sensation, or any other input the person is receiving. This burned-in sensation is now a turn-on.

As my own curiosity permited, I masturbated to the idea of my girlfriend and I hugging and the lighthearted feeling she created. As a result, when we hugged and/or kissed, I got aroused. (for those curious, this was when I was in Highschool and still learing more rapidly than I could keep track of.)

All this to say that when/if Brittany has sex with her hubby, Abby will become attached to him emotionally as well. If she has a strong, stubborn mind, and is extremely disinterested in every way, she will probably fight it off pretty well, but these hormones are powerfull. If she doesn't have a strong mind (like 99% of humanity, including me) she won't stand up long at all and will probably end up wishing within the year that He was her husband too.

To help show how powerfull these hormones are, I will share that I am one of those few guys out there who love a woman for her soul, not her chest or bjs or whatever your thing is. Being the loving man I am, I don't want to lust after my girlfriend's body, therefore I am currently single until I get my hormones straight (14 months so far, and still no idea of when I can permit myself to love another) of course, concerning mattes of love, my mind is weak. concerning most other matters, I am very loud and stubborn, a very testing predicament I have been battling since I started puberty and have yet to solve.

If you wish to ask me questions or discuss something, feel free to email me at lifestudent101@gmail.com because I more than likely will not visit this page again.

Comment by Anonymous2

May 15th 2009 00:06
Liz,
that last link leads to a pornography site.

Comment by GlenB

May 28th 2009 06:29
What is that expression about 'Two birds with one stone'?
At least Brittany's sister couldn't screw her husband behind her back!

Comment by R. Willis

June 6th 2009 01:12
I think that they have discussed the situation fully. In the work place, they will have to be paid two separate salaries, they have two separate drivers license, two separate social security numbers, life insurance policies, etc. They are two different people. Now when it comes to marriage...why cant they both marry the same man? The answer is simple: Outside of the state of Utah a husband may not have more than one wife. Britney and Abby are probably both getting married and did a paper, sissors, rock as to who will be awarded the engagement and get to kiss the boy at the wedding.

I think that both of them know that their situation is different from most americans and this way they can both get a legal christian marriage. I am sure that God knows the situation they are presented [although I am a believer in science] and it would be improper for them to have two separate husbands sharing the same vagina--because it would complicate things between both sisters and the men as to producing offspring with different dna from the same organism and its also incest for both of them being both mom and aunt [atleast from a religous point of view]. The government will not allow one man to marry both of them because that would open up a large array of problems with the homosexual marriage situation.

I think that the man 'britney' is marrying will be a great husband to both britney and abigail. He is probably one of their close friends and the three of them have come to terms with the fate. I think that he is getting two special women who will love him unconditionally.

This family situation is great because there will be three incomes and when the kids are born, they may have to deal with teasing, as I am bure brit and abby have come to terms with over the years, but will be better cared for than most children in the american population.

Besides, individuals how have come before and after me, sex is a private matter! Exactly how do you have sex with your spouse? How deep is your wife's vagina or how big is your husband's penis? Uncomfortable, right? Let them decide how they will have sex because its really not a public matter.

My perception may be incorrect, but I hope britney and abigail have a wonderful life that is full of love, passion, romance, and most of all happiness. Everyone has struggles and it brings joy to my heart to see how these two sisters have coped with their biological status--and have unconditional love for each other.

Comment by Judy, Florida

August 1st 2009 15:58
Don;t you have anything better to do than tear apart two children? They have been in the limelight since birth and are a bit tired of it and are trying to live normal lives. Who cares about the sexual relations with their respective husbands, that is theirs to work out.
You should be thanking God that you did not have to go through it either in your life or your childrens life.
Pray for them and their spouses and children to be. Grow up and find another site to trash.
Scripture tells us to be thankful in all things. Are you??

Comment by ValMickey

August 28th 2009 07:59
I'm not sure how they expect to be paid two salaries. Its not like they can work on two computers with only 2 hands. Also, if employed, they will both necessarily have to take the same job at the same place. I wonder how they manage sleep. Does one sleep while the body and the head of the other carry on awake? Or must they both be asleep at the same time? What happens if one (god forbid) dies? How do they coordinate movement of hands and legs? Does one control the left leg and the other controls the right? It would be take miracle of coordination just to stand and walk straight. Also, how about hunger? Do they feel hungry at the same time? If they have separate driving licences, it means they would have had separate tests. How did the inspector know who was actually driving the car? If either commits a crime, how does the judiciary justify penalising the other by sending them both to jail?
I must say, I'm fascinated by both of them. I hope things turn out well for the both of them.

Comment by Anonymous

October 2nd 2009 20:26
ALthough it is a bit of a wonder to me how the girls would make it work out, I think it's completely infantile to have this long of a discussion about it. No matter how long we speculate on it, there is no way of really knowing, short of asking them.
And anonymous who is calling them 'a monster", don't you think there are child rapists and serial killers to scream that at? I guarentee you the true monster is in the mind, and it seems you are one as well.

Comment by Anonymous

October 17th 2009 11:52
sorry but im loling my ass off at all the people blowin up on this, is it such a bad question to wonder how they have sex? i mean there has to be some conflict in there, but most of all... i question why anyone cares, same on all of you for singling them out, despite whether or not its in a good or bad heart, simply singling them out like this is just like gossip in highschools.

and if your askin why im in this then? its to get mad responses out of you

-peace

Comment by Anonymous

October 23rd 2009 20:41
gross

Comment by Anonymous

October 23rd 2009 20:42
gross

Comment by Abby & Brit Supporter

November 16th 2009 13:30
It appears that many commenters haven't actually watched the documentary on these 2 girls, thus know nothing about them and are commenting out of their asses.

They are indeed separate individuals that just happen to have their bodies conjoined. They each have separate heads, mouths, esophaguses, stomachs, and lungs although the lungs facing each other in the middle conjoin toward the bottom lobe. Their small intestines start out as separate then conjoin and from there on, everything is one. One large intestine, one bladder, one colon, one reproductive system. They do have 3 kidneys and an XL conjoined liver. They each control their respective sides of the body -- Abby controls the right arm and right leg, Brittany controls the left arm and left leg. When they took their driving tests, Abby controls the pedals and the shifter, Brittany controls the turn signal and the windshield wipers, and they both steer. They accomplish this easily because they've grown up since birth learning how to coordinate their halfs of the body -- they walk, run, swim on a swim team, play softball, play volleyball, type e-mails together, etc. If you spent every waking moment with someone from birth to almost 19 years of age, you would learn to be coordinated with them too. Plus twins have that special psychological connection, thus they understand each other and are on the same wavelength. It's no different than identical twins who live across the country from each other and somehow just "know" when something is wrong with the other. These two just happen to be conjoined. The girls had to be authorized 2 driver's licenses because they have 2 separate social security numbers, thus the government identifies them as 2 separate people. I would assume that this also means they cannot marry the same man as it would be illegal. HOWEVER, this would be something that would be individually decided by the girls AND the court system as needed -- just like when they discussed if they got pulled over and recieved a traffic ticket...they would let the court decide who would get the ticket based on the infraction and who was controlling the corresponding part of the vehicle (or if both would get a ticket). As for sex -- because there's a split right down the middle of the body in terms of nerve endings, they both would feel it. And for their sake, I hope both would be able to get enjoyment out of it. If you think about it, they have done all intimate things together since birth -- urinating, defecating, dealing with their period, bathing, dressing, etc...sex would be right along the same lines and probably not bother either to have to be present. If the other didn't want to partake in the act, they would either not go through with it or the non-participant would probably put on headphones and tune it out or something. Just like other conjoined twins do when one is doing something the other doesn't want to be part of. It's something they will have to decide how to handle between themselves and also with their respective partner(s), who obviously will have had to think about that situation and be comfortable with it before they even started dating either of them.

In regard to the comment above from whoever said they were told by nurses that parents could choose whether deformed babies live or not...that only applies to babies with massive deformities that require them to be on some kind of life support -- respirator, dialysis, etc. Parents can choose to pull the plug and allow nature to take its course. In the case with Abby and Britney, they were perfectly functional right at birth and did NOT require any kind of life support, thus they lived on their own and thrived. You cannot choose to "euthanize" them like an unwanted dog. That's disturbing. Also, their parents had no idea they were expecting twins let alone conjoined girls. They were expecting one baby and were surprised right along with the doctors when they pulled Abby and Brittany out.

It doesn't make anyone a "freak" to wonder these types of things about these 2 extraordinary ladies. It is human nature to be curious and inquisitive about things out of the ordinary, and doctors are just as curious about them as the public. However, it has been the parents' and the girls' choice to not be subjected to medical testing unless medically necessary for health reasons. They don't feel that they should be a science experiment, they just want to do everything they can to live normal lives as much as possible and when situations arise, make the best of it and compromise. I think they should be APPLAUDED for their hard work, dedication, and courage.

Comment by adiefiona

December 4th 2009 09:32
I love you "Abby and Brit Supporter!!!" You are clearly educated and think about the girls as they think about themselves because of it. I have watched all the clips of their documentary that I could find on YouTube and I think they are extraordinary young women. I'm not on here to speculate; what most of you have been picking apart is solely their business, and although it is natural to wonder about it, since humans are curious and they ARE an anomaly, they don't deserve to be conjectured about in the way that is taking place on this thread any more than anyone else deserves to have their sex life analyzed.

As a single person in a single body, I too have a difficult time imagining how both the physical and emotional issues play out in terms of their dating and marriage. No matter what there will have to be some degree of sharing. However, as the lovely person above me pointed out, their conception of intimacy is very different from all of ours, so it doesn't have to make sense to us.

Please, go easy on these ladies. They are beautiful, graceful, and strong, and highly committed to living as normal a life as all their peers do. They accomplish that goal magnificently. If you haven't watched their documentaries, look them up on YouTube: "Joined for Life" 1 through 5. They explain a lot about their lives and you see the remarkable way in which they live in their very unique situation. Anyone who is hating on them will probably feel a lot differently after they watch these. Be kind; they are just other human beings like us, they feel just as we do. Treat them as you would anyone else.

Comment by Anonymous

December 28th 2009 14:16
Whoah, dude. It's like, instant threesome. Awesome.

Comment by Anonymous

December 30th 2009 03:11
shouldnt he engage to both of them?

Comment by Anonymous

December 30th 2009 03:11
shouldnt he engage to both of them?

Comment by Abby & Brit Supporter

December 30th 2009 03:22
They are 2 separate people with 2 separate social security numbers, 2 separate driver's licenses, 2 separate personalities, 2 senses of style and likes/dislikes, 2 sets of friends, etc. They each have their own interests in men and just like everything else, will have separate relationships.

Comment by Anonymous

January 12th 2010 08:48
ppl need to leave these two gurls alone....i'm sure everyones curiousities get the best of them. but why make it the main concern and main topic of conversations vs. thinking of the hardships these two gurls ( woman) have had to endure. put urself in the shoes for a minute remember when u were all kids and played that game the three legged race and how difficult that was and that was just a brief race. these gurls had to learn everything and be in synch with eachother for everything. try pulling up a pair of jeans buttoning them and zippering them with one hand. that must be what it feels like for these gurls or even tieing shoes. i challenge any of u close minded conformists who call them monsters/freaks anything of the short to look outside thier little redneck hillbilly boxes for a minute and try either of the things i just said maybe then you can understand the hardships that these gurls have had to overcome that none of us could ever possibly comprehend. they are in no way freaks because they have a medical condition.....is a person with down syndrom a freak? with cancer, with muscular dystrophy anything of the like are they freaks and monsters due to a medical conditon. a medical condition that i might add they have adapted to and thrived with. everyone who feels the need to put these gurls down due to this i feel are very ignorant ppl with nothing more to do then put ppl down for being diff. get a life those gurls have survived this long with this conditon and most likely will live a long and happier life then any of u ignorant ppl will......only suggestion i have for those gurls is try to stay out of the lime light because this country is full of ignorant close-minded who sadly will choose not to accept them for what they are.......two endearing strong willed gurls who have chosen to keep fighting to thrive in a world thats not ready for kind hearted ppl that are diff.

Comment by Anonymous

January 13th 2010 03:45
To the above poster -- why is it that you can spell "muscular dystrophy" but you can't properly spell "gIrls"?

Comment by Anonymous

January 17th 2010 20:59
you all have issues!

Comment by Anonymous

January 17th 2010 21:00
you all have issues!

Comment by Anonymous

January 17th 2010 21:00
you all have issues!

Comment by LoveTheAbnormal

January 25th 2010 23:27
Dont't be retarded and mean everyone!!!
Their two seperate people! NOT monsters you JERKS!!!

one is in love, im not sure how but yea. and I hope the best for her marriage if she goes through with it
<3
Your text goes hereYour text goes here

Comment by Anonymous

February 1st 2010 14:52
I think they are beautiful. I have followed them for years. There parents did a great job teaching them to be individuals. I hope the live a very happy life.

Comment by Delray Beach,FL

February 6th 2010 20:49
I admire the parents, their friends and their piers for accepting Abby and Brittney and supporting them through every moment of their lives. But....I too am skeptical of love and a sexual relationship. I am concerned for their mental health in regards to this. It is difficult at best to wrap my mind around this. Seeing them on the discovery channel as high school teens I see two wonderful, beaufitul, "individual" girls loving life. They have been encouraged to be the individuals and indepent girls they have become. Now "one" is engaged. Maybe we would have to be them to understand what an intimate relationship means and feels like to them. But I "really" have to wonder what the guy is thinking. Is he real? Is he a freak? Does he see them as individuals or one? Honestly if I were their mother, I would insist on a psychologiical evaluation of the fiance and psychological and relationship theray of the "three" of them before I allow something as life changing as a sexual relationship and/or marriage. Even I would be in therapy because I would need to know how to handle any negative fall out if there were a breakup. Then again, as their mother, she knows them better than "anyone". For the sake of these two beautiful, wonderful, outgoing girls I hope and pray the man in their life is real, true, and as acceptionally wonderful as Abby and Brittney.

Comment by Anonymous

February 13th 2010 06:15
What if the one thats not going to be married can only feel it when they have sex? And Com'on the other one should get into the Sex action with the husband too. The Oral sex for the guy would get good. Two at once on his dakine. He should at least get that for marrying her or them or whatever!

Comment by Anonymous

February 20th 2010 20:39
What if the other twin wanted to get married too..wouldn't it get a bit messy with sex?

Comment by Janniella Morain

February 21st 2010 07:26
I think they have difficult times when deciding.

Comment by Moragina Tostal

February 21st 2010 07:29
Janniella Morain you rule!!

Comment by jalee chen

February 21st 2010 07:32
i am from wilkins public school year6 in 2010 and i love sex and gritty.i look at boobs and have a boyfriend which i love looking at his ass.

Comment by Kendrix

April 4th 2010 13:47
If Brittany is really engaged (for this could still be a hoax), then she and her sister have probably already discussed and solved the problems.
I'm not surprised that Brittany is the first to be engaged, from the Documentaries, I got the impression that she's the more romantic/emotional of the two.
It's not our business to invade Brittany's sex life, I mean, none of you would want to tell the world what you do with your Boyfriend when you're alone.
I just hope that her fiancée is a reasonable, nice person and not some pervert like those who are present here and wish her (and Abby) good luck at fulfilling their wish of becoming Mums one day.

Comment by Anonymous

April 11th 2010 23:11
These two wonderful girls have basic human rights like the rest of us.

Good healthy questions are not about "how" they have sex, but if they agree to it. What if one doesn't agree and her twin has sex - isn't that rape? If one is married and the other not, isn't that illegal in about 49 states?

The children - whose are they, especially if two husbands are actively involved. Will a DNA test reveal the real mother?

Besides, someone blogged that Brittany controls a leg. From what I have read Abby controls both legs and Brittany controls only the left arm. I would think walking would not be as graceful if each controlled a leg.

Which gets me to my next point. Brittany only feels the upper right part of the torso and right arm. Does she feel anything below the waist? And if Brittany doesn't, that would mean Brittany's future husband would only be giving pleasure to Abby during sex with her.

Please clarify if you have better info.

I truly mean no disrespect to anyone, especially Abby and Brittany.
The twins are a Joy and I only wish the best for them.
I only bring these questions to bear because these are the issues that are pertinent to them, our legal system and the general morality issues of the entire world.

Truly a time of testing our beliefs.


Comment by adiefiona

April 13th 2010 02:00
They equally split their body in terms of what they control and feel. That has been explicitly stated in the documentary about them. Abby controls the entire right side, Brittany the entire left side. In light of that, their grace in walking is amazing.

The documentary also explained what organs are shared, and their entire reproductive system is shared. That means that they would probably sense equally, and that the DNA in their eggs would be the same. So if they both have children with different husbands, their children would biologically be half-siblings. But Abby and Brittany are legally two individual people with distinct driver's licenses and Social Security numbers. So their children would be legally the child of the husband in question and whichever mother's name was put on the birth certificate. The father of the child would be determined by DNA testing, so his wife would naturally be written down on the birth certificate as the mother.

I know the idea of having 2 husbands with 2 wives sharing 1 body seems really weird when we think about the sensations and intimacy of sex, but as one astute commenter here pointed out, they are such an exception that things that seem weird to us are just normal to them. They and their husbands would obviously come to an understanding,

ALSO, by the way, I read from a reliable source that Brittany is NOT engaged, it was just a malicious rumor.

Comment by Anonymous

April 13th 2010 02:40
I have looked for details on the left right control of their body and so far the evidence presented and this one website:

Really Long Link

Points out that Abby has full control of both legs-
"Abby controls the legs so will operate the pedals, they each control their own arm so both will steer but no-one really understands how the visual information is processed."

I also believe that quite possibly Brittany doesn't feel either leg as well, as control and feelings usually go together. I know the spinal columns are completely separate and I speculate that only Abby's spinal column are connected to the nerves that go below the coccyx. The fact that walking is so graceful really supports this theory.

I appreciate waht you said, "that it is well documented that Brittany controls the left side of the body", but I have not seen any video, documentation that support that.

If you have a link to support your statement, it would be "more" appreciated.

Comment by Anonymous

April 13th 2010 03:18
I see were many websites state that claim each twin controls half of the body. But the TV documentaries, and even mom don't take any steps to volunteer any information on who controls the left leg and sense of feeling(s) below the waist

Comment by adiefiona

April 13th 2010 04:27
I have tons of homework so I'm not going to look up the videos right now, but I CAN tell you that the reason Abby "controls the pedals" is just because she has the right foot, like how everyone else drives.

Comment by adiefiona

April 13th 2010 05:23
Ok, scratch that, I couldn't resist. Listen to the part where they are playing basketball, it says they each control one half of their body.

Really Long Link

And note the first few sentences of this video: Abby only controls the right arm and leg, Brittany the left side. Neither has any sensation of the other's side of the body.

Really Long Link

Comment by adiefiona

April 13th 2010 05:23
Ok, scratch that, I couldn't resist. Listen to the part where they are playing basketball, it says they each control one half of their body.

Really Long Link

And note the first few sentences of this video: Abby only controls the right arm and leg, Brittany the left side. Neither has any sensation of the other's side of the body.

Really Long Link

Comment by Anonymous

April 13th 2010 05:32
Too bad the links don't come across, but I think I remember the video. I believe that is when they were 16 years old and maybe it was their first TV documentary.

I think that makes them so much more amazing.

Actually, unbelievable.

Thanks,

Now get back to that homework!!!

Comment by Anonymous

April 15th 2010 08:31
People, if they have any brains (which i suspect they do, two of them in fact) they aren't worrying too much about whether or not they will be paid two salaries and are instead thinking up a way to take advantage of their malevolence medical mystery to tip the balance in their favor (in terms of their bank account(s). It shouldn't be too hard.

Comment by flandew

April 23rd 2010 01:39
This is my thing, This guy is marrying two people, really, but it says he is marrying one, so either the other twin is going to feel lonely and misserable for her life feeling like she has no one, or eventually there won't be a marrage at all or some wierd three some marrage, or she'll get engaged too and then they will have 4 people sleeping in the same bed, and develope some wierd thing with 2 guys and 2 chicks all being into eachother but when they do have sex cause they did express they wanted children who's would be who's and if one guy is having sex that is still part of the otehr twin so wouldn't the other get jealous? are they going to take turns like I get you for a year and vice versa, one of the men would get jealous after a while either way, mad props to these twins for the courage it takes to do all of this.

Comment by Anonymous

May 10th 2010 04:54
You all disgust me with your questions and comments... Think about this.......How would you feel if everyone found out that you had sex with your mother or father and plastered it like hollywood trash mags all over your town or city, so no matter where you went or what you did someone would know you had sex with your mom/dad... that feeling you would have is probably close to the feelings they have when they read all this trash about them... Fuck off and grow the hell up.. They are humans with feelings and they have a right to be loved unconditionally and they have a right to some fucking privacy.... i hope Karma comes back and bites you all in the ass someday for your cynical comments and concerns, i am sure if you focused this much on your own life you woul dhave you own sex life to talk about.......

Comment by Anonymous

May 10th 2010 04:54
You all disgust me with your questions and comments... Think about this.......How would you feel if everyone found out that you had sex with your mother or father and plastered it like hollywood trash mags all over your town or city, so no matter where you went or what you did someone would know you had sex with your mom/dad... that feeling you would have is probably close to the feelings they have when they read all this trash about them... Fuck off and grow the hell up.. They are humans with feelings and they have a right to be loved unconditionally and they have a right to some fucking privacy.... i hope Karma comes back and bites you all in the ass someday for your cynical comments and concerns, i am sure if you focused this much on your own life you woul dhave you own sex life to talk about.......

Comment by Anonymous

May 10th 2010 04:54
You all disgust me with your questions and comments... Think about this.......How would you feel if everyone found out that you had sex with your mother or father and plastered it like hollywood trash mags all over your town or city, so no matter where you went or what you did someone would know you had sex with your mom/dad... that feeling you would have is probably close to the feelings they have when they read all this trash about them... Fuck off and grow the hell up.. They are humans with feelings and they have a right to be loved unconditionally and they have a right to some fucking privacy.... i hope Karma comes back and bites you all in the ass someday for your cynical comments and concerns, i am sure if you focused this much on your own life you woul dhave you own sex life to talk about.......

Comment by georgiadrew

May 11th 2010 02:40
The head on the left should have been removed at birth so the other girl could have a normal life. The mother is soooo unrealistic about the future - the girls are freaks and will always be treated as such. Of course people take videos of them, they are weird. The mother insisted on keeping them together, and now they have another 60 years of being a two headed person.

Comment by Anonymous

May 14th 2010 10:11
If they were smart, they would go into the porn business. So much money to be made there.

Comment by Anonymous

May 14th 2010 17:51
You can't just "cut off the head on the left"...it's not like one person who just has an extra limb, that is not just an extra head, Brittany is a full person whose half of the egg just didn't fully separate from the other. And Abby wouldn't be able to live a "normal life," because she only has control of the right side of their body, she can't move the left side at all. PLUS, they are two people internally from the waist up, so it would be like having a dead body inside of her so Abby would probably die too.

But aside from the practicalities I just said, you are a DISGUSTING, HEARTLESS, IGNORANT PERSON to say such a thing. If you knew ANYTHING about them you would know how completely wrong that would be, so until you know something about them other than what they look like you should not be talking here.

Comment by Anonymous

May 21st 2010 18:12
Honestly, who are we to say what decide what is normal. Rules and norms are set by people and its always changing, it is very subjective. It is their business and their life. So as long as they are happy and not harming anybody, I don't see why people are making such big deals out of it. They are great girls who are living their life and who are we to judge them. Congrats Brittany! Best of luck to these girls!!

Comment by Anonymous

May 22nd 2010 04:17
Stumbled upon this blog and am blown away by the comments. Praying that those marvelous, unique and remarkable girls, Abby and Britty, never read the crap that some of you have posted here. Shame on you, you hateful creeps. (Abby and Britty, if you're reading this, ignore the moronic, contemptible morons who write this stuff.)


Comment by Anonymous

May 22nd 2010 04:17
Stumbled upon this blog and am blown away by the comments. Praying that those marvelous, unique and remarkable girls, Abby and Britty, never read the crap that some of you have posted here. Shame on you, you hateful creeps. (Abby and Britty, if you're reading this, ignore the moronic, contemptible morons who write this stuff.)


Comment by Anonymous

June 5th 2010 15:25
Some of you are just absolute Hipocryts (excuse the Spelling, but I am Just Furious !!!). Britney and Abby are Absolutely Gorgeous !!! They are Wonderful Girls ..... Yes GIRLS ... PLURAL ... They are 2 Separate Individual Girls ... Not 1 Girl with 2 heads. Read their Anatomical Statistics you Rude People: They have mostly 2 of everything.
As a matter of fact, BRITNEY is MARRIED Now. They have often said they are looking forward to becoming Mothers. I would imagine that their Conception would be done by I.V.F., and that they would have a Caesarian Birth (mainly for Safety Reasons); but I could be wrong, and if they can have natural sexual Intercourse and Conceive, and then give Birth naturally, well GOOD LUCK to them. Some of you people have Sick Minds, saying that Any Guy would have to be A Sex Deviate: That IS NOT TRUE. If I fell in love with Either of them, I would treat HER just like any OTHER Normal girl; and I would treat the Sister just like I would treat An Other Normal Sister-In-Law.

As for Sex, I would only Partake in Physical Sex in compliance with The Sisters terms; and I'm sure that The Sister would Turn a Blind Eye to our Actions. As a matter of fact, from what I have heard, whilst they were dating prior to Britney getting married, the other would Take A Book with her. Sex is a Beautiful Thing, NOT SOMETHING DIRTY, like Some Of You are implying. I am Sure that One wouldn't Deprive Her Sister of Such Pleasure. I'm sure that they have discussed the situation and came to some solution long before it was time for that to happen.

So, Some Of You Rude People Need To GET A LIFE And Learn how To Respect Those 2 Gorgeous Girls !!! . . . . . How Would YOU ALL Feel If They Were YOUR OWN DAUGHTERS And Other People Were Making Discusting Rude Unkind Remarks About YOUR CHILDREN !!????!!!??

WE LOVE YOU BOTH BRITNEY & ABBY. GOOD LUCK PRECIOUS GIRLS. Congratulations Brittany on Your Marriage and Congratulations Abby on Being A Loving Caring & Understanding Sister (and Sister-In-Law).


xoxoxo Hugs & Kisses to you both.

Comment by Anonymous

June 5th 2010 17:08
You're right about them. They are truly wonderful girls.

The only real exception to your comments is that when, or if, they have sexual intercourse it's not going to be easy for one girl to "turn that blind eye.
It has been made clear that the each girl controls and feels their half of the body. Shares the senses of that area of there body. So if one girl has sex, both feel it. So if one doesn't want sex, that would constitute rape. So the only other option here is, that both girls "want" sex.

It's not a problem for me, because maybe I am part perv, but many see this as totally unacceptable behavior. Essentially it will be a threesome every time they have sex with a guy. I guess one girl could volunteer to be knocked-out. I was going to say drugged, but that would affect both girls. I'm not trying to be rude and it's obvious that threesomes are not socially accepted by many. So everyone could,just turn a blind eye or deal with it.

Apparently, not only do they have senses around and in their portion the vagina, it is assumed that if one girl climaxes the other one would as well. I'm not sure, but I would assume that that's actually infinitely more difficult for them as it's hard for many women to climax even when they have one body wired to one brain.

So every thing being what it is, I believe they will figure it all out and have fun doing so. You go girl(s).


I applaud them and wish them a wonderful life.

Comment by Anonymous

June 6th 2010 19:00
adiefiona If you watch the Documentary on them driving, they each actually say that one controls each Pedal.

Comment by Anonymous

June 8th 2010 08:28
I wonder if they've been working on their BJ technique just in case they both like the same guy.

Comment by Anonymous

June 12th 2010 05:42
maybe one owns the front door and the other the back door.

then maybe they could both get engaged.

Comment by CrazyKat

June 18th 2010 03:55
How amazing! I never knew somthing like that could happen. But wouldn't it be weird if, like, they had married conjoined twin BOYS!!! I just heard!!!

Comment by Anonymous

June 25th 2010 02:38
the Siamese twins, Ying and Yang. were married. they had 2 households and I think there were 19 children. maternal twins share the same dna, so it does not matter "who" baby a child would be. the child would always have 2 arm to hold and care for the child. TW0 mothers. TWO women who have had to learn since their time began to work together. with one controlling the right side and the other the left.

Congratulations Brittany Hensel and her wonderful husband to be.

Comment by Anonymous

June 25th 2010 08:00
congrats Brittany. I am 52, never married and I am not a twin. I am very happy for you and for Abby, I know you will be the most wonderful sister-in-law.
I am so happy for you both and your fiance and I pray for a happy, healthy life and I pray for the best for all of you and I hope that the public will leave you alone and that you can lead a normal private life, you both deserve this. Thanks for sharing your lives with us on TV, but, I do hope everyone leaves you both alone to live your lives to the fullest and the way you both want to live it. Have a great life and continue to enjoy life. Ignore all the stupid comments that people say, you both were created wonderfully and beautifully. Take care, have fun at your wedding.


Comment by Anonymous

June 26th 2010 01:03
Ummm, Sara Dobson, it's religious RIGHT, not religious Reich, you moron.

Comment by Anonymous

June 26th 2010 04:12
Your text goes hereYour text goes hereSorry but I think the guy must be sick or twisted myself. And also, if she does become pregnant who is the mother?

Comment by Jensee

July 5th 2010 20:12
Your text goes here
I really hope they have a happy life. But,...in all honesty....if it were me and my conjoined twin were to get married, I would probably ask the doctors if there were a way that I could take some sort of sleeping aid or use some type of meditatopm technique. So I could not be fully aware when my twin and her husband were being intimate. That is an emotional tender moment and it will be a very difficult adjustment to make when three people are in such a relationship. Serioussly...they both will technically be the mother of future children, because they both will have to give birth. The genetics of regular twins is hard enough and I couldn't even imagine being a conjoined twin. As for the man or men that marry into such a situation...all I can say is that you should get professional help to help you to be prepared for such a situation, because dealing with the in-laws is hard enough without having one attached to your wife in bed for the next 50 years.

Comment by Anonymous

July 5th 2010 20:45
Well, do they masterbate? Because THAT is equally personal. And they DO share the same junk. I can't imagine such a life.

Comment by Anonymous

July 5th 2010 22:19
EWWE I totally thought the same thing but didn't dare to say it.

Comment by Anonymous

July 5th 2010 23:11
Oh, I went there! LOL

Comment by Anonymous

July 7th 2010 01:17
these 2 girls had many milestones and obstacles in life that they had endured , yes their united at the waist but indeed 2 people ,i agree with adiefiona , whoever is not supporting or makin fun or wise cracks , you truly dont have the concept of life and probably need a life yourself ,your a monster within yourself !!
as for the girls , i wish them the best life of parenting and marriage they can endure , i wish ya both the best of luck , life is a highway and young ladies should enjoy , conjoined or not !

Comment by Anonymous

July 7th 2010 03:10
Ummmm....it's THEY'RE, not THEIR. And YOU'RE, not YOUR. Just saying. It helps if you can construct a proper sentence in your own native tongue if you want to be taken seriously.

Have a nice day!

Comment by Anonymous

July 7th 2010 05:23
Well I think people are just curious. I mean would you like to have sex with your spouse with someone attached to you at the top? How does that work? Come on everyone asks.

Comment by Anonymous

July 8th 2010 09:58
is this real life

Comment by Anonymous

July 9th 2010 16:33
If they masturbate, is it incest?

Comment by Anonymous

July 13th 2010 14:52
I think we should just let them be, Alright? Its THEIR lives! But i do have to wonder but what if the sister hanging off the other what if she dies....what will happen? I mean it looks to me that if you cut out the sister hangin off the other could be normal. And which one is the one gettting married?

Comment by Anonymous

July 13th 2010 15:15
"Hanging off the other"? What an offensive statement. You can't just CUT one sister off the other, what's wrong with you???? If that could have been done they would have done it!

Clearly if one dies the other will die also. And I noticed that you chastised us for having curiosities. Told us to "LET THEM BE". Then you went ON to ponder your own curiousities. That's called being a hypocrite sweetie. Don't tell us to let them be and then continue on with your OWN questions about them. That's the pot calling the kettle black. Why don't YOU let them be!?

Comment by Anonymous

July 13th 2010 19:33
I have the concept of life thank you very much and I am from the US which means my concept is individuality. Therefore it does not make me a creep or a hypocrite to wonder how these 2 people will have an intimate relationship with 1 man. And by the way if he has sex with his wife, is he also cheating on her with his sister in law? Its too weird for me.

Comment by Anonymous

July 13th 2010 19:39
No, what makes you a hypocrite is when you tell OTHERS to "let them be! It's THIER LIVES!" Yet then go on to DO exactly what you told others NOT to do. THAT is what makes you a hypocrite. So, it looks like you need to work on the concept of life, thank YOU very much.

So, now why don't YOU let them be, and practice what you preach, mmmkay?

And by the way, you can't CHEAT on someone who is RIGHT THERE. Cheating implies behind someone's back, in secret. Jeesh...

Comment by Anonymous

July 13th 2010 19:41
IF SHE TURNS A BLIND EYE THEN SHE IS TECHNICALLY BEHIND SOMEONES BACK! And as far as the law is concerned there are a lot of things to think about. First of all pologamy is illegal, adultery is illegal and you cannot legally have 2 biological mothers. I think this is unacceptable and the weirdo who wants to marry these girls needs his head examined.

Comment by Anonymous

July 13th 2010 23:25
These sisters can't "turn a blind eye" because it's right in front of their faces <eyeroll> So, what do you want to DO, refuse to let them ever get married? Arrest them for being conjoined? These are extinuating circumstances that call for a unique arrangment. Just because they are conjoined doesn't make them criminally responsible for being "adulterers" and polygamists. Give me a break.

And I'd like to know in what state adultery is illegal still (don't get me wrong I think it SHOULD BE illegal in every state). It may be technically illegal still in some states but it's just a lawsuit away from being made UNillegal for lack of a better term.

Comment by Jensee

July 14th 2010 00:22
If anyone thinks too long about these young women and their lives, I think it might make you a little batty. We can all say...."If it were me"..or "I would never do that if I were in their situation", but it just does not matter what we all think, because it is not our life. These girls had to deal with this since birth and it is just a gift that they have accepting loving people in their lives. We all want to be liked and loved for who we are and it's hard enough being...'technically' normal ...while going through this life. I can't think about this anymore because after thinking about their situation I came to the conclusion that I could NEVER understand their situation, Thank goodness that they don't have to live in my skin and I don't have to live in theirs, because our experiences are our own and their lives are none of my business. I reprimand myself for coming to this blog out of lurid curiosity. Good-bye.

Comment by Anonymous

July 14th 2010 02:08
Way too stressed here. The comments about turning a blind eye is NOT directed at these girls, but at society and our laws.

If the girls engage in a threesome, or anyone else does, society shouldn't jump on their case.

So this is blog a message about our crazy society rules, not how these girls are getting it done.

The curiosity over how these girls share intimate (daily) rituals - sexual or anything else, is fascinating to us mere mortals, but it is their privacy that we always need to respect.

Comment by Anonymous

July 14th 2010 02:14
They have no choice but to be present during each other's intimate moments, but it is not fair or accurate to call it a "threesome". That's just stupid.

Comment by Anonymous

July 14th 2010 03:09
They should have been institutionalized. This is just gross. I would have seperated them even if it meant death.

Comment by Anonymous

July 14th 2010 23:53
I'm sorry, but this is one person with two heads, that THINKS they are separate. Apparently the mother felt guilty about whatever she did that caused this, and taught the two heads that "they" are individual.
Sorry, but, one set of fingerprints, that's one person.
And the fact that she got a drivers liscense is just ludicrous! What the hell state is this where the DMV is persuaded by hype, or the mom or whatever, and they put a person like that behind the wheel? One second of a lapse in coordination could kill someone!
Not that long ago, when the baby was born, it would have been put to sleep. And then the parents would have been locked up or burned at the stake for devil worship or something. Just because today we CAN keep something alive doesn't mean we HAVE to. Sorry, but there's over 8 billion people on this planet now, it's 2010 people. (They've been saying SIX billion since the 70's folks) Wake up. Without population control, in just 300 years there will be 1.3 trillion.
Someone asked me in a discussion like this once, "Who are you to decide if someone comes into this world?" My answer is simple, and right, "One who is already here." You wouldn't let a bunch of strangers come into your house and start living there, would you? And then more and more, every week until you're crawling over people just to get through your house? And the government saying you have to let them live there? No, you wouldn't tolerate that. Just because YOU don't have to deal with overpopulation every day in your lifestyle doesn't mean others aren't having to suffer elsewhere.
Yes, I'm sure she's a good person and all that, now that they let her live, and develop, and BECOME a person. Now it's too late, and you have a developed person, who is going to need a lot of therapy after her mom screwed with her head(s). It must have taken a lot of campaigning and bribes to get the doctors and the gov't to regard her as two SEPARATE people. (hoping for two checks perhaps?) She's not separate, she's CONJOINED! God, people are so stupid.
One vagina = one woman. Sorry, but that's the truth. And what nobody is asking is, who would seriously wanna have children with her anyway, knowing how they might turn out?
She may have two heads, and both may argue about it, but in the end, this is one person, and that's how the law should have ruled on it. She should not have to work and have a job. I am sure she could qualify for SSD or some kind of help.
Seriously, she needs to get into therapy. The attitudes I've seen in the documentaries and interviews aren't healthy. How delusional and arrogant can you be to know what kind of problems you have (and will have later on) and still think you have the right to create more babies? Think of how messed up her babies are gonna be. This shows that she is living in the delusional fantasy world created by her idealistic parents.
Look, I know I sound like a bastard here, but think about it! If I met her IRL yeah I would probably love her too, we could be friends, and she's wonderful and puppies and hearts and rainbows etc etc, She's already here, and now, because of her problems, she will need an enormous amount of support, understanding and common sense. This isn't about that. It's about thinking ahead, and considering that there are ACTIONS and CONSEQUENCES!! Something most people today seem totally ignorant of. Responsibility.
For now, people may not have to think about consequences, we still live in a society that actually pays people to make more babies, and they take that money from the ones who don't. But eventually, we will have Population Management. It works pretty well in China, and it will work in the USA too.
The more of something there is, the less valuable it becomes. Think about it.

Comment by Anonymous

July 15th 2010 00:11
A BRAIN makes a person, not fingerprints. . Fingerprints aren't important. YOU could have no fingerprints if you lost your arms. Duh.

And since you're worried about overpopulation, why don't you volunteer to off yourself to make room for someone else. If you really want to put your money where your mouth is, you'll kill yourself and do your part for civilization.

My HOUSE is mine. The world is not. And really your argument makes the opposite point you want it to make. There is a shirt that says, AS A FORMER EMBRYO, I OPPOSE ABORTION. Meaning, it's the ones who ARE here that have no right to say who shouldn't, BECAUSE WE LET YOU IN. Your logic is flawed.

If you're talking about living where it's crowded in the US, MOVE!!!! There is plenty of wide open land out there. Just because all the idiots want to congregate in LA and New York doens't mean the SANE, intelligent people should buy your scare tactics. There is plenty of room, but you can't choose to live in a New York highrise and then claim it's crowded.

And AGAIN, your arguement ACTUALLY supports the opposite of what you seem to think it does. I'll copy and paste your sentence only insert a different word to show you how your attempt backfires. Actually, just because YOU feel overcrowded doesn't mean that OTHERS can't be born. That's YOUR problem. It's not the job of other human beings to make room for YOU. Don't like it, take a dirt nap. Just saying...

Luckily no one has to give a shit about what you think. You're entiled to your opinion, and so are her parents. I DO feel sorry for any kids you might be the parents of. Oh, wait, you shouldn't have HAD any parents. If you have children then you're a hypocrite. You're part of the problem. Simply put, if you are a parent, then everything you just typed is a joke. You can't be taken seriously. You can't claim that she shouldn't have been allowed to live because of overpopulation, YET HAVE SPAWNED YOURSELF. Like I said, that would make you a hypocrite.

Comment by Anonymous

July 15th 2010 00:49
I agree with the poster before this one. I am sorry but this is not a quality life. Its just not and anyone who thinks it is has to have their head examined.

Comment by Anonymous

July 15th 2010 01:12
Hey, no doubt they are two separate people. They're just not whole as far as the body is concerned.

If the fact that they aren't separate, whole and complete, as far as a body goes, then maybe we should 'off' millions of incomplete people in this world, including a bunch of war vets -- ludicrous, but it would save a lot of money.

But the threesome comment....well it's truely hard to get away from that one.
If you are saying that some girl can actually turn a blind eye while being poked - but wait... I remember a girlfriend like that once.

...Geewiz, maybe it's not a threesome after all, but a twosome with another person actively present, feeling it as it goes in her and she's just trying to ignore every stroke and maybe that awful, gigantic climax at the end of it all.
Are you trying to tell me she's going to ignore all that!
....What a sad state of affairs!!!

Personally, I'd cheat on her sister and enjoy every moment with her lover!!

Comment by Anonymous

July 15th 2010 01:18
If you don't think the girls are having actually having a threesome, then by that logic one sister could have a one-night-stand and the other sister is not an accomplice.


Comment by Anonymous

July 15th 2010 02:37
A threesome is illicit. It's "naughty". There is INTENT. This other sister is there simply because she has no choice. To accuse them of having a THREESOME is like accusing a rape victim of having sex. It's absurd. In fact, if that rape victim was a VIRGIN, IMO, she is STILL a virgin, because that is a product of VALUES. And her virginity is still spiritually intact. Because someone violated her against her will does not mean she was an "accomplice". Your logic is appalling.

They do have diffent personalities. And quite possibley different morals and values. The fact that they can not separate doesn't mean they are having skanky threesomes or accomplices to one anothers choices in behavior. There is no escape for that for them. If two prisoners are chained together and one stabbs a guard, is the poor slob unfortunate enough to be chained to him guilty also just because the cops chained them together?

Clearly if the other girl got married also, the men would share the body, but the emotional and spiritual connection would still be with the individual personality.

It's nothing that any of us can imagine, and attempting it is futile.

Comment by Anonymous

July 15th 2010 03:43
Faulty logic on your part!

If one of two handcuffed men stab a guard they do have individual hands, minds and conduct. the other is not an accomplice.

If one sister has a one night stand, about the only way that will happen is if the other sister simply allows it. Or she can say no and if necessary resist with a leg, a knee and an arm or she can bite an ear off. Pretty hard for a sister to have a good time with all that going on.

I'm just saying that if there is a one night stand by one and the other allows it, in doing so, it's her pussy she's still has to allow access to. Even as she lets here sister and her lover have have the time of their lives.

I'm sorry, I don't see a rape here...only one sister allowing her sister some fun...but absolutely not rape in my book.

Comment by Anonymous

July 15th 2010 03:59
Then going back to my "NOT so faulty logic".

The sister that allows her sister to have a one night stand while turning a blind eye, is in the room.

Her sister and her lover, while having wild passionate sex, are also by default causing the sister with the blind eye thing, all the feelings of penetration, touch and hormones to rush her.

So just by allowing her sister to have sex, she is by default present - a third person is having sexual intercourse with her sister's lover, husband or whoever, whenever or however sex occurs with any sister at any time now or in the future...period.

So do the math - it's a threesome.

Comment by Anonymous

July 15th 2010 04:52
Its still gross to me. AND if the one who is getting married is not a virgin would the one who has never been married and never had sex before "in her head" still be a virgin?

Comment by Anonymous

July 15th 2010 06:40
Once the pussy is penetrated and the hymen broken, it's over. Both sisters know how it feels to have intercourse at that moment and that can never be erased from either one of them.

But as far as a true love connection for each sister, we can only hope they both find that perfect partner and that all four of them can sleep together comfortably.
(I wouldn't want my wife to be sleeping with her sister and her husband without me. I'd get jealous)

Since the twins are connected the husbands will have to be understanding...it's just geographics.

Hope they get a big bed!

Comment by Anonymous

July 15th 2010 08:06
They are going to need a custom made bed.

Comment by Shan

July 15th 2010 13:50
The Hensel girls have individual minds too. And each one controls their own side of the body. So, AGAIN, your logic, or lack thereof, is faulty. Just because ONE girl decides to use HER arm to stab a person, the other girl is not automatically guilty. And if you think so, PLEASE, remove yourself from the voter registration list OR WARN the system of your ineptitude should you ever get called for jury duty.
Who the hell said it was RAPE???? Dear God, now you can't even grasp or comprehend English? The rape scenerio was an ANALOGY (should I give you time to google that word?) Clearly you're just an idiot if you didn't know that by the text. At least now I know what level of intelligence I'm dealing with here.
Ummmm, yeah, the sister IS in the room. Thanks Einstein. And your point is......? And you talking about sex is just.....gross, so please don't. "To rush her"? You're just....ewwww.
She's present BY DEFAULT?? Honey, she's present BECAUSE SHE'S ATTACHED. What is wrong with you; by default. Do you even know what that word means? It makes no sense in your sentence.
And, here, I'll say it SLOWLY so you can try to understand. A THREESOME isn't JUST about math. It's about a CHOICE in behavior. Intent. A THREESOME implies that three people are getting together to experience a nasty, illicit, or perverted sexual experience. These two sisters aren't engaging in any of that. They would just be having sex with a spouse and FORCED to have the other one present. Perhaps, along with the words analogy and default, you could google the word threesome.
A threesome implies a secret, planned, or conspired rendevous of seediness.
Yes, FAULTY logic.

Comment by Shan

July 15th 2010 13:53
Regarding their virginity, this is a unique situation and all normalities do not apply.

We're trying to apply standards and logistics that just don't compute here.

Comment by Shan

July 15th 2010 13:56
Virginity is a physical thing, I get it. My "in your head" thing was in response to the faulty logic of the other poster. In THIS situation, like I said, normalities can't apply. I think they would HAVE to be in agreement in order to sex to occur as they share the same junk. And if one says NO, I would say the other HAS to comply.

Comment by Anonymous

July 16th 2010 02:36
Wow! Someone really does need to look-up some definitions here, are we in seventh grade yet?.

Seediness and secret weren't listed for definitions I found for the word "threesome".


So let me help you understand the basic definitions you screwed-up in context here:

Default: means if she does nothing, she is going to be part of the threesome "because" she's is attached and , by default, (not taking some action to do otherwise), will be present.

The definition for Threesome: Three people engaged in sexual intercourse.
That one is pretty simple, huh?!

So here it is again:
She's there by default. Read slowly... Even if she willingly allows her sister's lover to penetrate her sister's vagina (that's sexual intercourse) - she is being penetrated too. (again by default)


Even if she manages to turn a complete blind-eye to the situation (and frankly that's impossible), her vagina is actively being penetrated by a penis - and the definition of that is - sexual intercourse.

So now let's wrap it up:
How many people involved with sexual intercourse here (and none against their will? - Answer: 3

Three people having sexual intercourse is called what? - Answer: a threesome.

And yes, I did look these up.

Comment by Shan

July 16th 2010 03:26
I don't want to KNOW what your skanky definition of a threesome is. I'm sure you're the expert though.

Your feeble attempt at schooling me about what default means was a flop since there IS no threesome. Nice try though.

The only thing simple is your mind here. Yes, there ARE indeed THREE people in a threesome. And I guess in your elementary world that's all there is. However, language has more dimensions. There are cultural elements to words. The may have stigmas attached. They are far more complex than I'm sure your mind can probably digest. A threesome is more than simply 3 people involved in a sexual act. Try to abandoned your "see tree, must hump" school of though for a moment here if you will...a threesome, as I have already explained isn't JUST about math (however I AM pleased that you can actually count to three), it has a negative conotation in our society (perhaps not in your personal society, but in general). It is sleezy. I'm sorry if Webster didn't draw you a picture of two bimbos and a dirty old man, maybe you could have related to that?

SO...sorry I don't have stick figures for you, or maybe the doll you used in therapy...in the Hensel's case how could the unmarried sister refuse the married one of HAVING SEX WITH HER HUSBAND? I mean, I'm sure you're used to the word NO, but let's assume that the one twin and her husband LIKE each other. Of COURSE the spinster sister, sharing a VAGINA and all, is going to oblige, as she has be obliging ALL ALONG.

In fact, I'm sure these two have fine tuned ways to tune each other out in ways that you and I can't even imagine. Perhaps they have come up with a way to even do it during a newlywed rompfest. One can only hope.

If YOU call the act of one sister letting her twin have sex with her husband without putting up a fight a THREESOME, then YOU GO GIRL!!

I, on the other hand, do not. To ME, a threesome, not ONLY has THREE PEOPLE (and I know it's hard for you to let that bare bones concept go), but it ALSO carries with it a SLEEZE factor, which is NOT there in this case.

I actually did try to read your post slowly, but the sentences were so simple and lackluster, so elementary that I breezed through them. I, as you can see, have a much more defined way with words. Not so much the gift of gab, but a forte for the written milieu.

Comment by Anonymous

July 16th 2010 04:34
And when the other sister gets married two men with be having sex with one woman, then can share memories and you know "hey remember when we did this?" I wonder if when they have 2 husbands if one will get to have sex and one with get a BJ at the same time. EWWE

Comment by Anonymous

July 16th 2010 07:01
you people need hobbies. Go outside. Read a book......

Comment by Anonymous

July 16th 2010 09:53
Well if you really want to read a book what are you doing replying to me. HUH?

Comment by Shan

July 16th 2010 14:18
Well, the two husbands WLL be having sex with one BODY. But they have two brains and personalities, so they'll be connecting emotionally with the one they are married to and love, just like any two other married people. But, YES, they will share the same body from the neck down. Which is, as most of us agree, pretty weird.

I don't know what the one poster means by "married to her vagina".BUT I'm assuming that these two girls, who are Christians and most likely have morals that reflect that faith, will not be out bed hopping like most permiscous American women, so I don't think that will be an issue. I also doubt that the "other" twin maintains a lifestyle of bar and club hopping looking for single men to screw as the poster suggests. But they have been dealing with the issue of wanting to do two different things at the same time their whole life, so this is no different.

And clearly the "read a book" poster is too stupid to recognize that we ARE reading. AND replying. And interacting with people. YOU might want to try it yourself. Not to mention that the poster is also clearly a hypocrite, as WHILE she told us WE need to read a book, SHE/HE is NOT reading a book and is ALSO on the internet responding to people on a message board.

Again, pot calling the kettle black. Just one more internet hypocrite troll.

Comment by Anonymous

July 16th 2010 22:54
It's all about you Shan

Comment by Shan

July 17th 2010 01:45
Now you're getting it!!

Comment by Anonymous

July 18th 2010 18:50
I still want to know who feels it when your banging tha snapper out

Comment by Anonymous

July 18th 2010 18:51
I still want to know who feels it when your banging tha snapper out

Comment by Shan

July 18th 2010 20:40
Well, I guess it's like both wanting to use the bathroom at the same time. You take turns.

Comment by Anonymous

July 19th 2010 18:12
It seems to be well established that the twins would both equally feel something when the husband(s) or boyfriend(s) have intercourse with one of the twins.

What is interesting to me, one poster here claims that this didn't qualify as a threesome.

To be honest, even if the one twin obliges to allow her portion of her body to be accessed by the other twin's husband. At some moment in the ordeal(s), if you will, the obliging twin may find the physical penetration and other feelings rather pleasant, interesting or even exciting.

It is in this very moment that I would say that all three are involved in an emotional and physical threesome - by whatever definition of threesome you have.


Comment by Shan

July 19th 2010 18:18
Agree to disagree. And call it a day.

Comment by Anonymous

July 19th 2010 20:58
Does each husband get one boob to himself?

Comment by Anonymous

July 22nd 2010 01:25
Who cares about whether it is a "threesome" or not? The generally socially accepted (not technical) definition of a threesome is not in operation here, and as these girls are a total anomaly, many normal definitions do not apply to them.

Additionally, discussion of the definition of their sexual relations is just a diversion from the real issue here: two couples sharing their own individual romances, while the two women share the same body.

The girls wouldn't marry anyone who didn't accept them as they are, and any man who was "weirded out" by this issue wouldn't want to marry them. They would go into the marriage with a full understanding and agreement to how it would work. If they loved each other enough they would work it out just so they could be together, and their love would come before any secondary logistics.

Comment by Anonymous

July 22nd 2010 11:17
THE TROLLS ARE HAVING A FEEDING FRENZY WITH THIS ONE HOLY SHYTCICLES

Comment by Anonymous

July 25th 2010 04:01
They are beautiful and couragious young ladies. How would you like to have to deal with their challenges? I applaude them!

Comment by Anonymous

July 25th 2010 04:09
And I may not agree with you but I support your right to say it. My opinion? Mom should have terminated them because that is no way to have to live.

Comment by Shan

July 25th 2010 11:53
"The generally socially accepted (not technical) definition of a threesome is not in operation here"


EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment by Anonymous

July 25th 2010 23:40

so...

TECHNICALLY....YES ?


By whatever socially, politically correct or generally accepted definition the world (or perverts) wants to give this, hopefully the love the twins and their husbands share in will be society accepted.


Comment by Anonymous

July 26th 2010 02:16
EWWE gross I don't accept it. I have to deal with it and if I met them in person I would have manners and be nice but I don't accept it deep down. Its preverted at best.

Comment by Anonymous

July 26th 2010 03:49
T1: WOW! That was really nice dear. I just want to say how much I love you, my husband!!!

T2: Guys? I'm so sorry. (crying). I know you guys where having fun and everything, but I just need to be honest here and let you guys know - I just cheated.

H1: What? You didn't! How could you.

T2: Well, I didn't mean to...it just kinda happened. (sniffle) It really didn't mean a thing, honest!

H2: Well that's the last time...it's time for a divorce!!!! (crushed and hurt, he stomps out of the room)


Comment by Anti Vigilante

July 26th 2010 04:22
It's so simple all you retards should understand it.

They grew up around normal boys and girls. One of them likes one of them.

It's not like they moved into a new town and all the pervs turned their heads. Got it?

And if there's sex, the other can put on headphones or something. It's up to them to figure it out.

Now for the people going monster, go ahead imagine yourself snuffing the life out of these two girls. Oh, you need a vomit bag and therapy now? Good! Welcome back to humanity. Now get a life, you trigger happy knee jerking attention hogging little s***s.

Like leave Brittany and Abby alone or something.

Comment by Anonymous

July 26th 2010 07:03
Yeah I can imagine snuffing out the life at the abortion clinic when the mother found out they were conjoined.

Comment by Anonymous

July 26th 2010 07:03
Yeah I can imagine snuffing out the life at the abortion clinic when the mother found out they were conjoined.

Comment by Anonymous

July 26th 2010 07:03
Yeah I can imagine snuffing out the life at the abortion clinic when the mother found out they were conjoined.

Comment by Anonymous

July 26th 2010 07:19
By the way there is no "god" either and when you die you are just worm meat. Sorry to burst all your bubbles in just one day.

Comment by DrangonAnonymous

July 28th 2010 18:15
The main curiosity seems to be if both are participating in sex. Even thought it is none of our business it is very interesting. It's something only the girls will know the answer to.
The threesome comments: They both have their separate drivers license and ss numbers so it can be defined as a threesome. Unless we are defining them as people by "fingerprints"
IF the body functions are split both must participate in a hug. I believe in sex it would be the same. Having sex moving only half your body would be very limiting.
I'm sure am curious on the arrangement made.
The truth is that both girls have to learn to live together without fighting and each taking turns deciding what they want to do and where to go.
Props to them for patience and unselfishness. I don't know many people who could spend every moment of their lives with the same person without becoming resentful of the person's company and wanting some alone time.
There is always someone who will accept us for who we are and it is nice that they can find someone too.

Comment by Anonymous

July 30th 2010 04:09
That son of a bitch! I hate him. I hate him! There's no way he can have sex with one with out having sex with the other! Lucky stiff. Damn it! I'll just have to make do with my girlfriend that likes watching me have sex with other women and watches porn with me!Your text goes here

Comment by Anonymous

July 30th 2010 06:20
ewe

Comment by Anonymous

July 30th 2010 10:13


I wonder what it's like never being alone.
You can't drug your twin sister asleep or you knock yourself out too.

If one twin doesn't get sleep for like 30 hours even as the other twin gets normal sleep, does one or both of them feel tired. Or maybe only one needs to sleep for both of them.

If one exerts herself (somehow), I'm sure both feel the the same exhaustion level. If they jog, do they both breath heavy?
I think they have three lungs - so does that and two mouths/airways help in breathing and getting oxygen into the body?

Comment by Anonymous

July 30th 2010 10:14
Soooo many questions

Comment by Anonymous

July 31st 2010 04:51
Could it be that their seemingly telepathic ability is really an indication that it is one person occupying one mind. Sort of like a ventriliquist job going on? Anyone want to take a chainsaw and find out? The book of Home Remedies could get another chapter added to it the next time it gets published.

Comment by Anonymous

July 31st 2010 05:08
I met to say: one person able to occupy two heads.

Comment by Chong and Dong all in one

July 31st 2010 05:22
my cojoined twin brother, he chinese too, he he make sound all time like someone stepping on a frog. he got arrested once for showing big hard nose to girl at the zoo, I had to go jail too..

Comment by Shan

July 31st 2010 16:35
I think it would gross to have another face to close to yours. I HATE when people talk in my face...and I'm repulsed by the thought of another person's breath near my face and nose.

They should write a book. It would most likely be a great financial move and you KNOW the publishing companies would fight for them.

Comment by Anonymous

August 3rd 2010 00:05
think about it, these girls have had to do every private, embarrassing thing imaginable together and in front of each other for 20 years, so i’m sure it would be no big deal for them to have sex together with one man. they would probably both be into it, since they share the same sex organs, and therefore, the same orgasms. the guy would probably find it fun and exciting, and maybe he would be allowed to touch the other girl’s side and kiss her as well. however, when the other girl gets married later, the new guy will have to get used to living in the same house as the other husband, and taking turns of who’s going to have sex with the girls on which night. one of the husbands would have to sleep on the couch when one of those nights happens. and i’m curious, when one of them dies, would doctors just surgically cut the dead girl’s head off? and leave the other to only be able to use half of her body? or since they pretty much share the same organs, would they just die at the same time from an illness, ailment or old age that came about?

Comment by Anonymous

August 3rd 2010 06:40
That about sums up all the sex stuff.

How about marriage? How would the day to day be with two husbands.
I think having two husbands "in the family", if they are the right guys, would make life so much better for everyone concerned.
The income needed for special health issues, raising the baby(s). One could stay home while the other worked. It would be so much harder for one husband to take care of them all.

Comment by Dr Freak (Mini-Me)

August 3rd 2010 21:32
DARN! I was hoping they'd fall for Lobo the Mexican Wolf-Boy!

I'd make a film about it! And I'll say I'd share the proceeds with them (really I won't). Then they'd move to India where everybody there worships us circus freaks as gods and live happily ever after!

Comment by Anonymous

August 9th 2010 05:55
determining the mother of the child, for when they get pregnant, is also more logical than people think. it would all depend on which husband of the girls gets them pregnant. the mother would be whomever is married to that husband who was trying to get them pregnant. the two husbands would also have to take turns with that, y'know, trying to create a baby with the girls.

Comment by Anonymous

August 10th 2010 14:24
Yeah but still 2 people would be the mother of one biological baby. AND they would have to DNA test each baby to determine paternity each time. Nothing like waiting until your baby is born to know if you were the one to put the ball in the hoop if you get my drift?

Comment by Jensee

August 10th 2010 14:51
Ok....I can't believe I came back here, but I had to throw this out there....Wouldn't it have been perfect if they had just fallen in love with regular identical twins? But, I know, it is not an ideal world and we can't help who we fall in love with....BUT....that would have been perfect. I don't think we would be as curious about the situation then, because...think about it...identical twin DNA is the same and there couldn't really be any question of paternity because DNA tests would show that both men would technically be the father.

Comment by Shan

August 10th 2010 16:26
That's absurd. Identical twins are still TWO SEPARATE people. Are you suggesting that children and parents are interchangable because they are identiacal twins? Your child is YOUR child regardless of whether you have a twin or not. Give me a break.

If YOU had an indentical twin, and the two of you married identical twins, and then you both went on to have children, are you saying that you could swap kids and that would be ok with you simply because both sets of parents are identical twins??? Clearly you didn't pay attention in biology class

Just because both sets of twin PARENTS may have the same DNA doesn't mean their KIDS are going to look alike!! In fact one married couple could have a BOY and the other a GIRL. Idiot.

Comment by Anonymous

August 10th 2010 16:30
i guess their kids would just have two moms on their birth certificate, and would call both of them "mom." they'd probably end up calling the two husbands "dad" too, since it would weird to try and explain to the kids which dad created them. nothing wrong with that.

Comment by Jensee

August 10th 2010 18:37
Wow, 'Shan' ! That is NOT what I was saying at all. You really are a wanker for taking an innocent 'thought' and completely blowing it out of context.
(sigh) Life would be so much easier for ALL of us if we could just see 'all' children as our children....and respect each other.
Instead of attacking me...you could have made a rational observation. I pity you, Shan...I hope you don't relate to that way to everyone who has unique observations that are different from yours. I was being sincere in my thoughts....it was 'just a thought. That doesn't mean it's right or wrong, mate....it was just a thought...

Comment by Jensee

August 10th 2010 18:43
I figured that the child would refer to whichever twin was married to the biological father, 'Mom' . They created that child together and they are the ones married or involved. I couldn't imagine having a baby growing inside you, giving birth and then realizing that you aren't the actual mom, but the aunt. whatever the case may be. The child will be very much loved.

Comment by Shan

August 10th 2010 21:58
See ALL children as OUR children? What planet do you live on? My children are MY children. They do not belong to EVERYONE. That is even more absurd than your first idea. I do not subscribe tot he Hilary Clinton "it takes a village" school of thought.

And what's with the hypocricy? You want ME to "respect" YOUR post, but your comeback to mine was "I pity you"? Practice what you preach MATEY. And what's with the name calling? Wanker? Funny in your attempt to teach me to respect people with other views you managed to reduce YOURSELF to the level of hypocritical namecaller. Great logic!

And exactly Jensee, the man married to whichever twin the child belongs to would be the one to whom he calls father. Except that WHICH twin is the mother? They share their reproductive system, so WHICH one is the "real' mother? There is only one way to call that one and that's to do a DNA test to see which husband did the sire'ing : )

But really, I wonder if they can even HAVE children. I tend to doubt it.

Comment by Anonymous

August 15th 2010 00:06
Eh. I'd hit it.

Comment by Anonymous

August 15th 2010 03:13
Yeah i think if both were freaks in bed .I guess they would have to be hahaha. Anyway I like the other guys comment for dem to get in the porn business. The directors imagination could go wild with dem. Also reading eveyones comments on here have raised alot of questions that are hard to figure out. Like if one dies? Only getting paid at work for one person?. Maybe telemarketing? both could use a phone and get paid twice! But i keep thinking about the sex. 1 vagina so if they both marry, the girls will be cheating on there husbands everytime. 1 will everytime they have sex. I think the husbands should do them at the same time one gets the rear and one gets the front. That way the husbands feel like the other guys not banging his wife.If he's in the action too

Comment by Shan

August 15th 2010 15:49
Well, if both of DEM where making calls at the same time, they SHOULD get paid "twice". Though it wouldn't be getting paid twice, it would be each of them getting paid for the job they each did.

And AGAIN, cheating is about deception. There will be no deception happening. What is WRONG with you people?


Comment by Erin Ferguson

August 31st 2010 02:58
Abby and Britney Hensel are two beautifully special INDIVIDUAL women who are not freaks but a special gift from God that should show us all how adversity can be met with a positive and healthy outlook to produce a happy and healthy life. Their romantic lives are of no business of ours and I am sure that the girls have fully discussed this between themselves and the husband to be. Leave these brave and special girls to have their amazing inspiring lives and for those who wished them dead or called them freaks...your the monsters not the girls.

Comment by Anonymous

August 31st 2010 07:46
Umm Wake up god did not create man...MAN CREATED GOD! Abby and Britney are to zygotes that did not completely seperate during pregnancy. They are an anomoly of the human reproductive system gone wrong. Yes they probably are nice, but they are also not exactly normal either.

Comment by Anonymous

August 31st 2010 08:06
You are so sure God didn't arrive first, are ya? Boy, are you in for a surprise.

Comment by Anonymous

August 31st 2010 10:24
Two heads are better than one. I hope one doesn't snore and keep the other one up.That would suck.

Comment by Anonymous

September 1st 2010 14:55
IF there is a diety that is all powerful and rightous then according to YOUR Xtian laws he will forgive me and I will ascend to heaven anyways, wo what does it matter. As long as I attone for my sins and accept Jesus then I am good to go right? Well Jesus was a JEW and JEWS are expected to have a BRAIN (unlike Christians who are expected to be sheep). So in my estimation Jesus would appreciate my intelligence and quest for the truth.

Comment by Anonymous

September 1st 2010 18:08
You really are in for a surprise...hope it all works out for you.

Comment by Shan

September 1st 2010 18:59
Three errors in your post.

You have to REPENT, with a SORROWFULL heart, in order to be forgiven. And what LAWS are you referring to? Forgiveness is done through mercy, not laws.

And YOU can't atone for your own sins. Only Christ can attone.

And Jews must come to salvation the same way as we all must, brain not withstanding.

Comment by Anonymous

September 2nd 2010 03:42
I love pissing you so called rightous off. It's so fun.

Comment by Anonymous

September 2nd 2010 06:43
You haven't pissed me off, you can't even touch that.
However, what you can't or don't have will actually piss you off, you just don't understand that yet.
Yeah - you're going to claim you know more..bla, bla, bla...heard it all before..

You may not like it, but I'm praying for you, bro.
(to my very real God).

Comment by Shan

September 2nd 2010 11:38
LOL @ you thinking you have the power to piss us off. Now THAT'S funny. And to school you a little more, it's not religion, it's a personal relationship with a living God. Why on earth would what you think piss me, or anyone elso off? That's a little silly, don't you think? I mean, why would ME going to heaven and you perhaps not, piss ME off? There is still time for repentence, so I say perhaps.


Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
1 Posts
2 Posts
8 Posts
61 Posts dating from December 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0
Moderated by Liz 4
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]